Details Books Conducive To Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Original Title: | Logisch-Philosophische Abhandlung |
| ISBN: | 0415254086 (ISBN13: 9780415254083) |
| Edition Language: | English |
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Paperback | Pages: 142 pages Rating: 4.07 | 15411 Users | 590 Reviews
Identify Regarding Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
| Title | : | Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus |
| Author | : | Ludwig Wittgenstein |
| Book Format | : | Paperback |
| Book Edition | : | Special Edition |
| Pages | : | Pages: 142 pages |
| Published | : | September 1st 2001 by Routledge Classics (first published 1921) |
| Categories | : | Philosophy. Nonfiction. Logic. Classics. Humanities. Language. Linguistics. European Literature. German Literature |
Narrative Supposing Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Perhaps the most important work of philosophy written in the twentieth century, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was the only philosophical work that Ludwig Wittgenstein published during his life. Written in short, carefully numbered paragraphs of extreme brilliance, it captured the imagination of a generation of philosophers. For Wittgenstein, logic was something we use to conquer a reality which is in itself both elusive and unobtainable. He famously summarized the book in the following words: 'What can be said at all can be said clearly; and what we cannot talk about we must pass over in silence.' David Pears and Brian McGuinness received the highest praise for their meticulous translation. The work is prefaced by Bertrand Russell's original introduction to the first English edition.Rating Regarding Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Ratings: 4.07 From 15411 Users | 590 ReviewsCriticism Regarding Books Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
Revisiting this with formal logic and knowledge of Frege and Russell under my belt changed the experience tremendously. It reveals a work as strange and idiosyncratic in approach as it is insightful. For example universal generality, a very basic operator (i.e. -all- men are moral), is something Witt provides good reasons for being skeptical of, though the point presses more on what we assume when we use them rather than their use, and I feel you first have to take (∀x) for granted beforeFirst of all, it should be acknowledged that my entire philosophical background is in continental, rather than analytic, thought. I come to Wittgenstein with very little context. The only other philosophers Wittgenstein directly references in the Tractatus are Frege and Russell, neither of whom I have studied. My only preparation for reading this was a (very good) book by Anthony Rudd that compared Wittgenstein's work with that of Heidegger, finding unexpected similarities in their projects.
I really enjoyed this book, my first by Wittgenstein, a book about the essential function of language and a sort of "theory of everything" of meaning. It starts off as a very cool, clear-eyed, incisive look at what language is, what it does, and how we can cull it to its essence to say something meaningful and true, then ends on an oddly metaphysical note that seems to throw everything that preceded it to the wind. The format is as economical and mathematical as Wittgenstein's arguments. It is
Patience is necessary if you're not within philosophy academia, like myself. It's not light reading but, conversely, Wittgenstein is not heavy material. In fact, it's the strict, disciplined simplicity of his ideas that adds some difficulty. The book ends on a fantastic note, either an affirmation or a haymaker to the field of philosophy. I'm still unsure which.
What can I say about Tractatus that hasn't been said a million times before? Crystalline... gnomic... dense... wrong. Well, I don't disagree with any of that, but it would be nice to have an image. I ask my subconscious if it can come up with anything, and while I'm in the shower it shows me the sequence from Terry Gilliam's 1988 movie The Adventures of Baron Munchausen, where John Neville and Eric Idle build a hot air balloon made entirely from women's lingerie.I am about to smack my
An Unutterable History of Complete and Utter Stuff and Nonsense in Reverse"Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent."Wittgenstein, 1922"Thou canst not know what is not - that is impossible - nor utter it; for it is the same thing that can be thought and that can be."Parmenides, a long, long time ago (before 450 BC)
Get your P's and Q's ready, folks, because we're in for the ride of our lives. Or not.Wittgenstein was living proof that androids were around and functioning during WWI. That at least this single android had a sense of humor dry enough to turn the Mariana Trench into the Mojave Desert, too.Or was this a joke at all? Let's see.Most of the numbered propositions were imminently clear and devoted to a single purpose: describing reality.Language is the big limiter, which should never be a big
No comments
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.